Will Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in October?BTC, $60K- Yes
- 0.1%
- 24h volume
- $751.8
- Liquidity
- $108.18K
$235K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:31 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
Will Bitcoin dip to $60,000 in October?BTC, $60K
Will Bitcoin dip to $70,000 in October?BTC, $70K
Will Bitcoin dip to $72,500 in October?BTC, $72.5K
Will Bitcoin dip to $75,000 in October?BTC, $75K
Will Bitcoin dip to $77,500 in October?BTC, $77.5K
Will Bitcoin reach $82,500 in October?BTC, $82.5K
Will Bitcoin reach $85,000 in October?BTC, $85K
Will Bitcoin reach $87,500 in October?BTC, $87.5K
Will Bitcoin reach $90,000 in October?BTC, $90K
Will Bitcoin reach $92,500 in October?BTC, $92.5K
Will Bitcoin reach $95,000 in October?BTC, $95K
Will Bitcoin reach $97,500 in October?BTC, $97.5K$40K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:10 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$75K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:02 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$166K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 3:55 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$155K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 3:11 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$63K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:35 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$235K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:31 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$26K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:09 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$28K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:55 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$38K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:11 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$22K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 12:57 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$47K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:42 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$57K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 10:59 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$30K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 7:45 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$53K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 7:16 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$75K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 5:45 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 5:06 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:15 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 7:17 AM UTC).
$22K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 7:29 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:47 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:23 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.7% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 5:00 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:13 AM UTC).
$21K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 10:09 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$20K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:46 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 99.0% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:21 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.5% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:29 AM UTC).
$19K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:59 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
$19K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:19 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 98.6% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:59 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 98.3% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:27 AM UTC).
$18K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:25 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 97.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 3:47 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 12:58 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:15 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:02 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 100.0% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:08 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.7% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:06 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:03 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.6% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:41 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.4% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 12:36 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.4% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:30 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.5% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:51 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 99.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 9:16 AM UTC).
$16K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:18 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 97.0% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:57 PM UTC).
$16K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:04 PM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 99.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 2:37 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 8:22 AM UTC).
$15K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:12 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 96.8% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:06 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.6% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:18 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.6% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 8:13 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.6% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:44 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.5% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:04 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 97.9% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:19 AM UTC).
$15K in unusually large fills in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 4:37 AM UTC) — size arriving in blocks rather than a steady trickle.
The leading wallet supplied 96.5% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 1:12 PM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.2% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 11:54 AM UTC).
The leading wallet supplied 96.1% of observed flow in the hour ending at the observation (Oct 29, 6:59 AM UTC).